Nats vs. Braves: Post-game thoughts
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. -- Another rough day for the Nationals' pitchers, and not much of it can be blamed on wind today. Washington's pitchers gave up 11 runs on 17 hits in an 11-8 loss to the Braves at Champion Stadium on Friday. In three spring training games so far (counting two split-squad games on Thursday), the Nationals have allowed a total of 36 runs and seven homers.
"It can be deflating," manager Jim Riggleman said. "We just kind of break it down to each individual. We're looking for individual performances out of the group that will eventually for the team."
That's about all anyone should be looking for at this point. As I mentioned over in our live game thread, several pitchers are still throwing mostly fastballs and trying to establish a base before they get too far into their repertoires. That's not true across the board, but it's still extremely early. Should this keep up for a few more days, I think there will be more worry among Nats coaches.
"When we start getting through four, five, six innings with (our starters), I think it's going to be a different story," pitching coach Steve McCatty said. "I fully expect us to do well. I do. This is just tough in this situation when you start out. I know what everybody's looking for. And then we walk some guys, we give up some homers and some hits. It's tough."
If you'd like to hear the full McCatty audio, or Riggleman's pre- and post-game sessions, you can check them out here.
With that, on to today's Golden Geese and Goose Eggs...
Golden Geese
Ian Desmond: Not only did he drive in six runs and hit a grand slam, Desmond made a couple of impressive plays in the field -- the best one coming in the third inning. With the bases loaded, Desmond made a diving stop on Martin Prado's grounder, saving at least one run. Then he got up, saw Melky Cabrera heading toward home and fired to the plate in plenty of time for Ivan Rodriguez to tag Cabrera out. When Derek Jeter makes the same play, we hear about his presence of mind and baseball IQ for weeks. Desmond, who also played some right field, probably is still a long shot to start at shortstop, but he's making a strong case so far. "I'm just going out and playing," Desmond said. "If they want to take me, they take me. If not, I'm just doing what I can."
Tyler Clippard: One of two Nationals pitchers not to give up a run, Clippard pitched a strong eighth inning, allowing one hit but nothing else. He continues to be a strong candidate to make the team, either as a situational reliever or a seventh-inning type.
Elijah Dukes: The right fielder went 2-for-3 with a long double, scored two runs and made a strong one-hop throw to home in the third inning with Yunel Escobar on third. Escobar was staying put anyway, but the fact he never thought about running, and the throw Dukes made, drove the point home: If Dukes can shore up his accuracy and be cleaner with throws to cutoff men, he'll make a lot of runners think twice about tagging up on him.
Goose Eggs
Craig Stammen: There were some encouraging signs in the right-hander's first outing since arthroscopic elbow surgery last fall -- he hit 93 on the radar gun after bone spurs kept him in the high 80s most of last year -- but Stammen's fastball command wasn't there, and he gave up four runs (three earned) in 1 1/3 innings. "We can throw all the bullpens we want to do. We can do all the BPs we want," McCatty said. "But when the national anthem plays and a guy's standing there with a piece of wood, you have to make a judgment what you see then. He'd been throwing real good, but now the juices are going. You just pump up a little bit, and you get off a hair and rush. That's basically what he did." So take some positives out of Stammen's day, but the result still wasn't pretty.
Jesse English: The reliever allowed three runs (two earned) in 2/3 of an inning. He's a long shot to make the team, but didn't do himself any favors today.
Victor Garate: Another reliever fighting an uphill battle to make the team, Garate gave up a homer to Brooks Conrad, the first batter he faced in the seventh inning.
What to watch:
We've dwelled on the pitching quite a bit, so we'll move on from there. Other than that, Ian Desmond's day is the most interesting development from this one. It's hard to believe Cristian Guzman wouldn't be the starting shortstop on Opening Day -- his $8 million contract and his status as a 10/5 player make him hard to move, and the Nationals aren't likely to leave him on the bench. But Desmond continues to make it hard to justify sending him back to the minors. If he keeps this up through the spring, the much-discussed utility role could be a reality for him, just as a way to keep him on the team and available on a daily basis. It was particularly encouraging to see him make strong throws after big stops; Desmond has taken some criticism for his throwing errors, and he took a little jab at the writers for that after this one. If he cleans that up, though, and continues to stay back on the ball, he's got everything he needs to play in the big leagues. Jim Riggleman said the reports from Jupiter on Thursday were that Desmond was the best player on the field, and Riggleman thought that was the case again on Friday. It's a good start for the 24-year-old.
Up next:
The Nationals' spring home opener comes tomorrow, when the Mets visit Space Coast Stadium for a 1:05 start. John Lannan will be on the mound for the Nationals, making his first start of the spring. The way things line up right now, the left-hander is slated to be the Opening Day starter for the Nationals. He reported to camp in impressive shape, and we'll get to see how that translates to the mound.
I enjoyed the chat again today; we'll be back with another live thread tomorrow. In the meantime, you can bring up any baseball topics you want in the comments section, and I'll respond in a timely manner. Talk to you later!
You can play against everyone or create your own league - and it's Free!
![]() |
Categories (click for archive)Ben Goessling | Nationals News |











About Clippard - why is he even fighting for a roster spot? The guy was the best RP the Nats had last year and I see no reason why a guy like Guzman has his spot secure yet a player that actually preformed last year has to battle to be a specialist/long reliever? I don't get it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
First, I fully expect Clippard to make it. The team loves what he's done so far, and there really isn't much else he could have shown them so far. But if he doesn't, the two things to remember are salary and options. Guzman is virtually immobile because of those two things, as well as his 10-and-5 status. I don't think you'll have to worry about Clippard being bounced, though.
Ben
Ben,
Why is Guzman's contract different from Olsen's status....both have one year (this year) under contract and like Hill last year...they could cut Olsen and pay just a fraction of his salary. Can they do that with Guzman?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Olsen doesn't have six years of service time, so they can still cut him and not have to pay the whole salary; arbitration rewards aren't vested in spring training. Guzman, on the other hand, has accumulated more than six years of service time and is on a guaranteed contract, so he'll get his $8 million regardless.
Ben
The team is allowed to start Spring Training 0-3. They are absolutely not allowed to start the regular season 0-7 again. I don't want to feel the season is over by mid-April again.
Thank God these games don't count.I won't worry
just yet.But if this continues they might need to sign another starter or make a trade.Thanks for the updates.You are doing a great job!! Ben,
do you they need another starter? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ideally, you'd like to see a better starter than one of the guys they have. But as far as pure inventory goes, no, they don't need another one. If Olsen isn't healthy, that might change things. Even if he is, though, they'll get another starter when Wang comes back, and possibly still another when they call up Strasburg (I'd expect that happens in June or so).
Ben
Ben; Your in game threads are becoming an addiction, its alots of fun to banter back and forth with the gang. Next Tuesday should be interesting!
Now onto the Baseball talk: I'm playing devils advocate here, but its annoying to think that a team that has lost 200+ games in two years has to basically trot out deadwood during the first week of spring training looking for some diamond dust. I'm talking about the "no-name" and "over the hill" pitchers. As a STH and just plain fan is just enough to make you wonder if there really is any light at the end of the tunnel.
Your old buddy Zuckerman laid out the brutality of the first two months of the regular season, jeez I guess schedule makers don't have a sense of humor. Phillies, Dodgers, Rockies, Braves, Mets, Marlins and Brew-Crew oh my! It might be too late for Wang, or SS to matter by then.
Also is Scott Olsen healthy? Again I'm hearing he might not be on the OD roster, is that true?
Yep, Ben's been doing a great job.
One day next week I hope to have time to get in on a game thread, but for now it's great to know I can stop by for a goose update. :-)
Ok, so we keep hearing that these first games mean nothing. At the same time, Jesse English did himself no favors today and Tyler Clippard continues to be a strong candidate to make the team. So what's the real story -- are these games super-important for the long shot players, but not for those who have a better chance based on past performance? How many chances does Martis get during spring training? Is his next outing kind of make or break? If so, why isn't that the case for Bruney, Bergmann, Stammen, and other pitchers who haven't done well so far?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
There isn't a science to this. It's still humans making decisions on other humans. But in general, I'd say you hit on a good rule of thumb: The more evidence a player has provided to suggest he's capable of getting the job done every day in the majors, the less spring training will affect him. For a player who's already in the back of the decision-makers' minds (i.e. English), there's less room for error. Again, that's not a uniform rule, but I think it's a decent guideline to use.
Ben
I thought "the time for excuses was gone".
Excuses mostly what I hear so far....."It is early Spring Training, it is only spring training, he was too excited, our real pitchers are not in the game long enough"...and the one two really love...."most pitchers are only throwing fast balls" and "we have better pitcher we are not just choosing not to use them right now".
Well you know what....the other teams have better hitters they are not using much right now too.....This team has not learned how to win that is for sure but they sure know how to lose with excuses.
Here is what Rizzo should say to help back up his first day speech and set the correct tone going forward.
"I am pissed that several pitchers have been in camp for weeks and are not ready to face weak lineups of hitters they should be way ahead of. It will not be tolerated and I will be making some cuts early from MLB camp because I expect our pitchers to be ready to complete. Martis, Baslistar and Louis A. are both going to be reassigned to MiLB camp tomorrow. I do not know how they could have missed the message I sent for this year. Be ready, Be focused or head down to Minor league camp and learn how to prepare there. Our camp is no longer open tryouts, those days are done."